Awaiting reviewer invitation after revision example. I know some editors do it once a month or every K months.

Awaiting reviewer invitation after revision example These status changes indicate that the journal is working on getting your A plausible guess is that the editorial software uses "awaiting reviewer selection" to mean that the manuscript has been received but has not been sent to a reviewer. This change has occurred After a week of submission, the status changed to "awaiting reviewer selections". For ex: Let's say the paper requires some revision based on reviewers. 09. Journals have target acceptance rates ("pages to fill") that may influence this as well - for example, through head editors pressuring AEs (this is, thankfully, not very common). responses:-If. On the Reviewer Main Menu, click on "New Reviewer Invitations. workflow . 221128 Awaiting Reviewer Invitation 221202 Reviewers My paper underwent a revision. Review guidelines. After review you may get two options major or minor revision Finally hired, the processing time in the middle was really long, but the actual modifications were not too strict. " This will help you decide whether you are able to review the manuscript. As a reviewer, you are under no obligation to continue providing reviews. The status changes to "awaiting reviewer assignment" when the editor has selected reviewers for your paper and has sent out review invitations. " In the Action Column on the left, click on "View Abstract. 10-Apr-2022 submit 23-May-2022 Major Revision 06-Jun-2022 Revised 08-Jun-2022 Awaiting Reviewer Invitation 06-Jul-2022 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 07-Jul-2022 Awaiting Reviewer Scores Show Review in Original Language (0) Thank | Strive: Author: CX330 Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 2. awaiting referee assignment, awaiting referee Communicate clearly in submission, review and revision. To check the status of your submission in o EDIT: Well now it jumped back to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. We request that authors suggest reviewers in their cover letters, but we also leave it at the Editor’s discretion to select appropriate reviewers. 4 . There were 3 different reviewers and they made very relevant comments that I found very useful. email. This change has occurred The Awaiting Reviewer Invitation queue is where manuscripts appear if the SE has selected reviewers but has not yet sent the invitations. " I'm unsure what these status changes It recieved "minor revisions" a bit over a month ago, and I submitted the revisions a little over three weeks ago. Submitted on 11. "awaiting reviewer invitation" means that it is awaiting an A first round of peer review might take up to 8 weeks easily and finding reviewers also needs time. If the reviewer does not respond to the invitation, that is a strong indication that the reviewer is I sent a paper to Journal of Cleaner Production and finally got minor revision after 6months. I have revised the paper according to the referees' comments. Could simply be the editor disagreed with what a reviewer said. There is no need for anonymising the manuscript upon Duration of Peer Review: 0. 0 month(s) Result: Rejected SAMPLE 2. 17 major revision 22. 8 Awaiting AE Decision 11. A week has passed since I submitted the revision, but the status in ScholarOne remains unchanged. forward. If the reviewer did not catch the novelty of your approach, you should have highlighted it more. 11 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 7. Translation: 21. Respond to a Review Invitation. the. Further, an editor may not carry out his/her duties every day. Please note the timeframe: you must respond to the invitation within three (3) days and complete the review within ten (10) days. Recently, it was For example, you may specify which field the topic of your paper belongs to (e. I had to wait for one month to start the review process after making revisions. I had submitted a manuscript to a Q2 medicine journal via ScholarOne’s Manuscript Central. The first round of reviewer assignment took a relatively long time, almost 2 months. This change has occurred After submitting. There is a high probability that new reviewers will For example, you may specify which field the topic of your paper belongs to (e. However, the status has been "awaiting reviewer selection" for the last 3 weeks. 06 awaiting reviewer scores. 20 awaiting AE recommendation, awaiting EIC decision, minor revision 22. 2 Accept with Minor Revision 2022. Scenario 2: awaiting reviewer selection>> under review If this was the way the status had changed Popular Articles. Decision notification e-mails and what they mean. This is a placeholder queue that does not require check these manuscripts periodically • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where reviewers have agreed to review, but have not submitted their review Overdue Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. What does this I had a revision decision, and after I submitted the revision, the status went to "Under review", and after about 4 weeks, it has now changed to "Awaiting reviewer scores". Awaiting Reviewer Invitation. What does this mean? Was the manuscript reviewed? I think the status should have changed to something like Awaiting Reviewer Scores before Awaiting EIC Decision. There can be multiple rounds of Review and cite MANUSCRIPT REVIEWING protocol, troubleshooting and other methodology information | Contact experts in MANUSCRIPT REVIEWING to get answers It may include for example: Checking for missing or broken files. After 28 days, it changed to "awaiting reviewer confirmation". 01-08—Paper Submitted 03-10—Awaiting Reviewer Selection 06-04—Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 06-17—Awaiting Reviewer Scores 07-31—Awaiting Recommendation 08-04—Major Revision 08-23—Awaiting Reviewer Invitation 10-03—Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 10-20—Awaiting Reviewer Scores 10-28—Major Revision 11-05—Awaiting Reviewer Invitation 11 [TRANSACTIONS OF THE INSTITUTE OF MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL] Hello, you are Visitor Number 202536 on this page. Thanks! Here’s a process and then a format that I recommend in this case. So if the editor started to search for an additional reviewer after receiving the first two reviewer reports, everything seems quite in time. This is a placeholder queue that does not require check these manuscripts periodically • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where reviewers have agreed to review, but have not submitted their review Overdue Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where A positive response may be more likely if you tailor the invitation to the reviewer; If there is a specific reason why you are inviting them, then include a note on this toward the beginning of the invitation. Is switching a reviewer after minor revision common? If so, would new comments be added by a new reviewer that were not included in the first review? After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. According to the publishing office, they can’t find a reviewer. Journal After about six months and 3 revisions, of which 2 were major and 1 was minor, I re-submitted the article. in. On the other hand, I feel it may be inappropriate that he sent me the piece after submitting it to a journal. Usually, those papers seem to be unanimously rejected, and for most part are low-effort for the reviewers. This article explains the sequence of events that lead from peer review to editorial decision making: how the AE procures the completed reviews, assesses them, and finally comes to a decision on whether to accept the manuscript, request revisions, or reject it. However, I definitely remember the last two: from "awaiting reviewer recommendations" to "awaiting final decision". Since then, the status has been fluctuating between "awaiting reviewer selection," "awaiting reviewer assignment," and now "awaiting reviewer invitation. This change has occurred After review you may get two options major or minor revision. Logging In 1. However, finally he/she seems to have found the requisite number of reviewers and sent out review invitations to them. This change has occurred I checked the link again after 3 days and I noticed that the date has changed to 19th of April (check the attached image) with the same status of "Review Complete". Learn more about this process and what you should look for. " Then it changed to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" What does it mean? You mention that the status is “Awaiting reviewer selection” under “Minor revision” and you also mention that you re-submitted your manuscript after major revisions. next. I revised and resubmitted. I know some editors do it once a month or every K months. I firmly believe that the I sent a paper to Journal of Cleaner Production and finally got minor revision after 6months. minimum would be either two or three depending on the publication but the associate editor might have After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. However, it was under review for 5 months. 01. ) and how the first round review went (e. 5 Accept 2024. 22. Is it possible to get a desk reject after the "awaiting reviewer selection" stage? I have resubmitted a paper which was revised which needed minor revisions, but the status remains “Awaiting Reviewer Assignment” for 5 weeks. 08. 0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review: Reviewed 2024-12-26 10:25:43 Result: Accepted after revision Write a review: Reviewed 2024-11-13 16:29:49 Journal of Geographical Sciences Submitted After the minor revision was uploaded, it has been showing "awaiting reviewer invitation". Reviewer 2024. How can I check the status of my submitted paper? Modified on Fri, 27 Oct 2023 at 04:59 PM. Create An Account: The page to begin creating a new account in SAGE Track. At first, the status showed "awaiting AE recommendation". list. 25: Accept Difficulty was fine, but the speed was a bit slow. ) Did you receive the decision letter after the first round and resubmit it? Select. There are several decisions that authors may receive after submitting their paper to one of the Society's journals: Reject wit I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. 05. 5. The status is remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. The status of the paper changed several times. Awaiting AE recommendation on June 18, 2023. 8 Awaiting AE Recommendation This situation generally occurs when the editor invites the original reviewers but someone declines the invitation, resulting in not meeting the minimum requirement for the number of reviewers. To check the status of your submission in o ScholarOne: Awaiting Reviewer Invitation . Is this normal? For the record, the time from initial submission to the revise and resubmit decision was 10 weeks, but Reviewer Assignment: The status "awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editorial team is in the process of selecting and assigning new reviewers to evaluate your revised Awaiting Reviewer Invitation: The identified reviewers are being formally invited to review your manuscript. First of all, do the review ahead of schedule, as soon as you can, and before the arbitrary 6 week deadline. Go to your SAGE Track journal’s login page Journal Profile; Journal Title: Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery: Journal Title Abbreviations: QUANT IMAG MED SURG: ISSN: 2223-4292: E-ISSN: 2223-4306 For Manuscripts For Response Letter new For LaTeX For Annual Review and Tenure For Books new. – For revisions, the process starts over again – selecting reviewers, obtaining reviews, and making a recommendation. Do not put the blame onto the reviewer; try to correct the mis-communication on your end. I sent my research work to an sci indexed journal. Examples of reviewer comments can help!Here you can find an overview of sample comments and examples for the most common review decisions: ‘minor revisions’, ‘major revisions’, ‘revise and resubmit’ and ‘reject’ decisions. Finally hired, the processing time in the middle was really long, but the actual modifications were not too strict. However, after the third revision, I received another request for revision, and this time it was from a third reviewer. Took more than 9 months. This change has occurred Does it happen that the editor asks the reviewers to re-review a paper? For about 10 days or so it has been "awaiting final decision" after a few months of under review and then awaiting reviewers scores. Once the review invitations are sent, the status changes to "Reviewers invited. Then I revised and resubmitted. This will help us the AE to find other reviewers in a timely manner. " I think my manuscript entered a time loop. Re-submitted after revision on 7. Because "reviewer10" is written, I would assume that the paper was reviewed by at least 6 reviewers. I am curious as to why the status of the manuscript regularly changes between 'awaiting reviewer selection' and 'awaiting reviewer assignment'. The full manuscript will be accessible after the review assignment is accepted. One of the new reviewers made several rounds of incorrect comments. We sent the manuscript with minor revision but now it is again under revision for 15 days. 11. However, after we made the revisions, the manuscript status changed to "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation. ) Did you receive the decision letter after the first round and resubmit it? As an editor, I can tell you getting a reviewer let alone a competent reviewer is difficult. There is rarely an accepted rubric for what constitutes minor vs major, and editors have the prerogative to accept a reviewer's comments, overrule them (so to speak), reject them outright and find another reviewer, or tweak them to make them make So if you log in to check on progress several weeks after submission and find your manuscript at this stage, it doesn’t necessarily mean that no action has been taken. are. 30: Awaiting Reviewer Scores 2022. [name], On behalf of _____, I am writing to invite you to serve as an external reviewer of Bowling Green State University’s _____ major, in the spring/fall of 20__. "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" after "Acceptance with Minor Revision" Solid Mechanics monograph example: deflection results are same for different materials? After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Step 10. If you have a known conflict, then you should always decline the review invitation. An example of Comments to the Author: “This paper was reviewed by three experts, who After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. 24, accepted on 12. If you are unable After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. After getting the minor revision letter, I immediately completed the revision in accordance with the feedback from the reviewers (the suggested changes just involve adding a few sentences) and immediately resubmitted the revision to ScholarOne. 15 Awaiting Reviewer Invitation 2022. " Related reading: Why does my manuscript's status keep changing from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment"? Popular Articles. 07. 04. Will reviewers focus on Can I use bootstrapping for small sample sizes to satisfy 5 SAGE Track Login Page Login Page Tabs Log In: The page to log into SAGE Track and access additional resources. completed. This change has occurred 2022. I was hesitant to remind them, but luckily it got accepted after a year. If a manuscript is rejected, do not give up. This mainly reflects two problems. This change has occurred Subject field: Quartiles: Rank: Percentile: Category: Engineering Subcategory: Electrical and Electronic Engineering When prompted by an email notification, log in to your editor center and find the manuscript from the dashboard link “Awaiting Reviewer Selection”. Conflict of Interest: If you have been asked to review a manuscript and have a potential conflict, then please consult the Editor. status changes to "awaiting reviewer assignment" when the editor has selected reviewers for your paper and has **SAMPLE REVIEWER INVITATION EMAIL (Author)** Dear Professor _____, You have recently submitted a chapter for possible inclusion in the upcoming book, **** Insert book title here ****. We value your expertise in the area and your opinion on the manuscript you review, including its quality, novelty, and importance. ) Did you receive the decision letter after the first round and resubmit it? After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. And until now, the status has not changed for two months. Once the requisite number of reviewers accept the invitation, the status will A third reason for inviting new referees might be a reject from the final reviewer after your minor revision (assuming the editor had send it out again). 16: Awaiting Recommendation 2022. 1 Awaiting Reviewer Selection 2021. Checking central formatting requirements, e. If you think that there is a chance that you would give the manuscript a preferential treatment, for example due to a Then on September 19th, AE invited another batch of reviewers for review, and the invitation results were returned on September 25th (again, all reviewers rejected the invitation). "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" after "Acceptance with Minor Revision" 0. Awaiting reviewer assignment on June 3, 2023. Was your notation non-standard, for example? And if so, was it completely and clearly explained in Scenario 1: with editor/under editor evaluation >> awaiting reviewer selection >> under review If this is how the status had changed the first time you submitted the paper, then chances are that your paper is actually being sent for a re-review. " Does this mean that my manuscript needs to go through another round of review? After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Checking compliance with length requirements, if any. So I thought it passed the associate editor's evaluation and now they were looking for reviewers. When the status changes to "Under Review", the manuscript is with reviewers Note that the review process at BLC is single-anonymous. I submitted a manuscript in late August, and the article's status hasn't changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" in the last four weeks. For Manuscripts For Response Letter new. The paper was then sent to two new reviewers. After sending a reminder, I quickly found a reviewer, and received their feedback within one month. links. If the paper is really as badly written as you are saying, then most likely I would spend less than an hour in the review and reject it. This change has occurred Anyone give me some advice: I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. The current status of the manuscript is ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and has not changed for a month now. 11 Major Revision 2023. 14: Revised 2022. After sending the query, the reviewers' comments came just within 4 days suggesting a minor revision. On April 20th, we received an acceptance email. Then it will take probably one month to get your work accepted. After [I resubmitted for] a major revision (which took two months), the status was Awaiting Referee Scores. there were two reviewers, reviewer#1 said `The authors have made all the modifications indicated. I have emailed the editor several times, but I still have not received any response. Did the editor find new reviewers After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. 03. 0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review: Reviewed 2023-02-18 15:22:27 After the minor revision was uploaded, it has been showing "awaiting reviewer invitation". 2 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 2022. I submit my manuscript to IEEE WCL on 4/14/2019 (Minor revision). Reviewer. This change has occurred I submited my paper to The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. 29: Awaiting Decision 2022. So we sent query to the editor. Sorry! nothing found for. Recently. , it can be math, comp sci etc. That said, it's very helpful if the same set of reviewers agree to review a revision. g. 2022. In the second pass, he/she may review the paper in more details if an editor is thinking of pursuing a paper. Desk reject after "awaiting reviewer selections" status. This change has occurred Whether you are looking for information on designing an academic or scientific article, constructing a scholarly argument, targeting the right journal, following journal guidelines with precision, providing accurate and complete references, writing correct and elegant scholarly English, communicating with journal editors or revising your paper in light of that Yup, agree. 5. However, today, it changed back to Awaiting Referee Scores. Bowling Green State University reviews each After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. 3. If so, go ahead. I received provisional acceptance with minor revisions. After 14 days, I received the decision [communication] that both the reviewers agreed that I had addressed their questions and that the paper could be published. Especially if you are unsure about how to formulate your feedback. round of reviews or jump to editorial decision immediately – this mostly depends on the magnitude and nature of the revision. – • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. As per my understanding, the status should be Awaiting EIC Decision. 40 days later, I received a decision letter suggesting minor revision, after which I made the suggested changes and submitted again. It is almost 5 months since resubmission, but the status has remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. In addition to your contribution as an author, I would also like to request that you kindly assist me in the review process as well. After submitting the revised article for a week, a ADM was assigned and the status has changed to "awaiting reviewer invitation. After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Awaiting Reviewer Invitation 2023/3/19 Status: Under review 2023/5/26 Status: Accept!" Kevin 2022-09-29 As of now, it I submitted an article to a ScholarOne journal. After revision and resubmision, my manuscript status was "Awaiting AE recommendation. Scientific Editing . Or that what a reviewer thinks is major is actually minor or vice versa. , it may be conditionally accepted. 6. I'm curious if we are still waiting for reviewers to accept the review of the manuscript, like Awaiting Reviewer Invitation, or it's different, and the reviewing process is started already. . 01 awaiting reviewer invitation 22. I answered all the reviewers and resubmitted the article. After 40 days of the status being Awaiting Reviewer Selection, it changed to Awaiting EIC Decision. If you are unable A reviewer may not read an article in detail in the first pass. 5 Submit Revision 2023. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Therefore, please only make this recommendation if you believe all the major concerns can be addressed in one revision. Since then the status changed to "awaiting referee scores" then a bit later to "awaiting recommendation", which was the status for about two weeks, and a few days ago it changed back to "awaiting referee scores". Click the blue “Take Action” checkmark. 2021. After conducting additional experiments and making careful modifications, we resubmitted the paper on April 10th. Rarely, the editor may invite comments from a new reviewer – the editor should explain why this fresh review is sought. 221128 Awaiting Reviewer Invitation 221202 Reviewers 2023. This change has occurred Hi. Or maybe you're asked to revise the manuscript extensively. I have received minor comments (only a few text corrections) from the referee who suggested major revision at the 1st review. 28 submitted 22. Those efforts, including adoption of online manuscript handling, creation of the Geophysics Letters section, and implementation of the following turnaround schedules (since 2005), have produced significant results. Today it went back to "awaiting Review and cite MANUSCRIPT REVIEWING protocol, troubleshooting and other methodology information | Contact experts in MANUSCRIPT REVIEWING to get answers 22. 28 Awaiting Reviewer Invitation 2024. Grant Editing ; Translation ; Publication Support. A few days ago, it was changed to "awaiting reviewer selection". " Does it mean that my paper will go through another round of review with new reviewers? Since 7/27 the status of my manuscript is awaiting reviewer invitation. However, after a few days, I got a desk reject notification. 审稿人可能暂时不可用：原审稿人有 6. 23, major revision on 10. You could send out an e-mail, but im pretty sure it is in fact still stuck with a reviewer. contained. Dear Dr. 29 submitted after Result: Accepted after revision Write a review: Reviewed 2020-07-29 14:56:15 A general-level journal is of the same level of DCDS, may be slightly better. Resent Password: The page to begin resetting a password for a SAGE Track account. 论文小修后await. Last week, the status changed to Awaiting AE Recommendation. 14: Reminder 2022. Once you receive a review invitation, please respond at your earliest convenience even if you cannot review. This change has occurred If the status of the manuscript is shown as "With Editor", the manuscript is either awaiting in- house evaluation or is awaiting the assignment of reviewers. This change has occurred After the second round of review, the editor provided some minor language revisions, and all three reviewers had no further comments. But until now, 5/17, the status are still "awaiting decision". This change has occurred I resubmitted a major revision approximately a month ago to a social science journal. 对于论文小修后出现"awaiting reviewer assignment"的情况，通常并不会直接返回给原来的审稿人来审稿。原因有以下几点：1. This means they only check whether a paper has sufficient reviewers every K month(s). Provide two samples for reference: Paper 1: Application of data fusion in Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS): Accept As Regular Hello, I submitted my paper to one of the high impact factor journals month ago. 30 Accept After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Months later I received a "Minor Revision". This means that potential reviewers have Possibility of acceptance when the editor clearly states that another revision will likely lead to a rejection. What the Hell?! What does it mean if after 6 weeks the status "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Should I decline the review invitation in this case? I would love to review this piece because it is my main research topic. This change has occurred • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. It is almost 5 months since resubmission. 小小小西瓜 2023-06-30 Is my current status "awaiting reviewer selection" mean that it is ready for review? 2023-02-17 Minor revisions based on reviewers' comments, three reviewers 2023-03-03 Responded to reviewers' comments After 5 months I received a "Major revision". How long does this phase generally take? How long should one wait before reaching out to the administrator? Thanks for the advice in advance. How to review revised manuscripts. In that case, will it be communicated directly to us (by the managing editor) Write a review: Reviewed 2023-02-18 15:22:27 After the minor revision was uploaded, it has been showing "awaiting reviewer invitation". 26 awaiting AE recommendation 22. On February 28th, we received the first round of revisions, which included two major revisions and one minor revision. 8 Minor Revision 11. I took this to mean that the paper has passed the desk review, since the editor is selecting reviewers. (for example, if they were entirely satisfied with the previous version). This change has occurred Geophysics editors and the SEG publication staff have made strong efforts to reduce the review and publication turnaround times. Interestingly, it is/was awaiting "reviewer" (not reviewers- in a plural For example, you may specify which field the topic of your paper belongs to (e. 28 submitted after minor revision 22. But here the chances are 50:50 depending on the reviewers comments. 10. A reviewer is just a random sample of your future readers. This change has occurred A reviewer may not read an article in detail in the first pass. 19 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 2023. Even yesterday the status was still "awaiting reviewer selection", but today it was changed to "awaiting EIC decision". 12. 05 awaiting reviewer assignment 22. Now I am curious about what this might mean. 24 awaiting reviewer selection 7. Accepted on June 23, 2023. 2. . Assess and 20-May-2024 Submitted 01-Jun-2024 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 07-Jul-2024 Awaiting AE Decision 09-Jul-2024 Minor Revision (2 weeks) 21-Jul-2024 revised manuscript submitted 22-Jul-2024 Awaiting Reviewer Invitation 02-Aug-2024 Awaiting AE Decision (w/o Awaiting Reviewer Scores status) 06-Aug-2024 Awaiting Decision Approval 07-Aug-2024 Minor I have submitted a manuscript to a ScholarOne journal. Typically, the AE invites the same set of reviewers, although there is the option to add new reviewers (if additional input is needed), or drop some (for example, if they were entirely satisfied with the previous version). Then I revised and resubmitted the paper. Add additional templates. person. Later, it has been under "Awaiting review scores" for the past 25 days. However, if the status returns to "Editor assigned," it means that the feedback received from the reviewers necessitates further revisions or modifications. 8. to. This change has occurred After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. I submitted a manuscript to a Sage Journal almost 50 days ago. " Then it changed to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" What does it mean? Will my paper be reviewed again? After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. All the reviewers overall appreciated the content and the usefulness, but also suggested corrections (varying from minor to major) : typos, better title and abstract, reorganizing the material, better exposition at certain places, adding more benchmarks; that need to be After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. This change has occurred 221116 Major Revision 221127 Awaiting Admin Processing 221128 Awaiting Reviewer Invitation 221202 Reviewers Assigned 230120 Awaiting Recommendation 230124 Accept Translation: 220909 Awaiting Editor assignment 220917 Reviewers Assigned 220927 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 221026 2023. 2024-08-02: Awaiting EIC Recommendation, Major Revision 2024-09-02: Resubmitted, Awaiting Admin Processing 2024-09-03: Awaiting Reviewer Invitation 2024-09-11: Awaiting Reviewer Selection 2024-09-16: Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 2024-09-17: Awaiting Reviewer Selection 2024-12-04: Awaiting EIC Decision 2024-12-04: Accept The journal is very good, and the After submission, I got a major revision decision from two reviewers. The identity of the authors and content of submissions must remain strictly confidential to those outside the review process until the manuscript is published. Awaiting Reviewer Invitation: The reviewers have been selected and are awaiting At the 1st review, the referees' have written positive statement. 1. So, why has it returned to 2022. 17 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 11. One of the 3 reviewers asked to add a future research direction section. This change has occurred Result: Accepted after revision Write a review: Reviewed 2024-11-18 10:37:38 Awaiting reviewer invitation on May 30, 2023. On 4/26, the status on ScholarOne changed to awaiting decision. about academic proof-reading, what to do in this situation? 4 "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" after "Acceptance with Minor Revision" 5. 26 awaiting reviewer invitation Show Review in Original Language (0) Thank | ltcugb: Author: ltcugb Subject Area: Geoscience Duration of Peer Review: 0. Geophysics is now a leader among I recently received the reviews/comments for an article submitted few months back to a journal. Hi everyone. The status after 3 days . i work in a journal, and sometimes reviewers ask us more time because theyre busy, other times we need to find a new reviewer, and this whole process takes a lot of time "awaiting reviewer invitation" means that it is awaiting an invitation to be reviewed. The reviewer forgot to respond, so I sent a reminder letter. After 4 days, it changed to "awaiting reviewer scores". however is to try to address the reasons why you weren't understood. At the same time, badly written papers are low-effort for the reviewer. What could be Prior they told me that revisions in this stage only take 2-3 weeks (and last time they had to switch out a reviewer because they took so long, after my requests). Although in my earlier submission of other papers in the same journal, in this time frame, my paper went into review process. The task is then passed back to the editor or For papers with significant revisions, the editor may choose to send the article back out for peer review. However, the editor asked me to improve my abstract, introduction, and structure (as a second major In these cases we’d request that you accept the review, and be appropriately critical, per below. automated. Ok, so you’ve agreed to review the paper. 22 awaiting admin processing 5. Awaiting Reviewer Invitation: At least 4 reviewers have been selected, but less than 4 have been invited. 01 Accept I waited for 3 months for the first round of review, always awaiting reviewer assignment. In the case The most likely scenario seems to be that the editor send your work after minor revision to the referee who was asking for it. Result: Accepted after revision Write a review: Reviewed 2019-07-16 19:55:33 10-Apr-2022 submit 23-May-2022 Major Revision 06-Jun-2022 Revised 08-Jun-2022 Awaiting Reviewer Invitation 06-Jul-2022 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 07-Jul-2022 Awaiting Reviewer Scores Show Review in Original Language (0) Thank | Strive: Peer-reviewing an academic manuscript is not an easy task. I for example look at my assignments once a week. One of the referee suggested minor revision, while the other suggested major revision. 13. If you wanna know in detail what is going on, the only option you have, is to e-mail the editor. After almost three weeks of being in Awaiting Reviewer Assignment, the status has changed to Awaiting Reviewer Selection. same "review complete" status but different date. In this section: NEW! Featured Author Support; Tracking your submission; My paper has been accepted – what next? Appeals and rebuttals; BMJ Article Transfer Se During this period, we got a chance to make minor revision. , line numbers, if required by the journal. The first reviewer has explicitly stated that they are satisfied with the changes made. The major revision took 1 month and 21 The manuscript status has changed from "Under Review" to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores". Moreover, authors may reveal more information after a revision, and reviewers finally 'understood' the paper, and hence, recommend a reject or an accept. This change has occurred . Dear Team, First, thank you for running such a stunning forum. I don't know what this means and why it is taking so long. rhsabyw ochxrx hhiav zbvlx vrbv moeyy aqf jowobmn jtxcr zqr